A 2016 medical article revealing the tragic death of one of its participants in the linchpin Dutch study – a little FYI, this entire child sex change experiment is based upon this study – is indicating that puberty suppression is likely to have been a factor in his death.
The specific case involves an 18-year-old trans-identified male whose puberty was blocked from an early age by the same Dutch researchers conducting the study. In blocking his hormonal development, by the time he was able to undergo the vaginoplasty procedure, the boy did not have enough penile tissue they would need to use to create a “neo-vagina.”
A riskier procedure needed to be performed, instead – attempted to use a section of the patient’s bowel. The procedure took a different turn, resulting in fatal necrotizing fasciitis.
The manuscript, by Negenborn et al., commences by saying that the absence of a functional vagina has a negative effect on the quality of life of women. Multiple surgical procedures have been described for vaginal reconstruction in these patients.”
Despite large doses of intravenous antibiotics and repeated surgical debridement,” the previously healthy patient went through multiple organ failure and died.
The investigation went into more detail, revealing that the deadly strain of E-Coli came from the patient’s own intestines, meaning that the riskier procedure needed because of his early puberty suppression almost certainly caused his death.
Dr. Michael Biggs, a sociologist playing a key role in the exposure of this scandal stated in a live podcast interview that the Dutch team does not acknowledge the young person’s death in correlation with puberty suppression.
This opens up an entirely new argument towards those defending gender-affirming surgeries, claiming their safety and efficacy, according to “studies.” Now that their main “study” is disrupted, how do those in favor of this mutilation, pivot?
Add comment