Patrick Bet-David pushes back on the claim that Lindsay Clancy lacked support before the deaths of her children. He points to the involvement of her husband, extended family, childcare help, postpartum treatment, multiple medical professionals, and numerous prescribed medications as evidence that she was receiving substantial assistance. PBD’s broader argument is that the case should not be reduced to a narrative of abandonment, and that the focus should remain on what the evidence shows about her mental state, treatment, and responsibility.
Add comment