The speaker explains why a strong investment track record alone no longer impresses him. When evaluating private-market managers, he wants to understand what actually produced the returns and whether that investment process has delivered consistently across multiple funds. Private-equity research has documented performance persistence, but the evidence has evolved. More recent work finds relatively little persistence in post-2000 buyout funds using information actually available at fundraising, while persistence remains stronger in venture capital. A headline IRR doesn’t necessarily reveal how a fund generated its performance. The speaker describes an unnamed manager whose impressive historical results were repeatedly driven by a single standout investment, raising the question of what happens when the next home run never arrives.
Add comment