Harvard University filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration on Monday after federal funding exceeding $2.2 billion was frozen due to the university’s refusal to comply with government demands for leadership reforms, changes to admissions policies, and restrictions on student activism and clubs.
“The consequences of the government’s overreach will be severe and long-lasting,” Harvard President Alan Garber said in a letter announcing the lawsuit. “Research that the government has put in jeopardy includes efforts to improve the prospects of children who survive cancer, to understand at the molecular level how cancer spreads throughout the body, to predict the spread of infectious disease outbreaks, and to ease the pain of soldiers wounded on the battlefield. As opportunities to reduce the risk of multiple sclerosis, Alzheimer’s disease, and Parkinson’s disease are on the horizon, the government is slamming on the brakes.”
“The Government has not – and cannot – identify any rational connection between antisemitism concerns and the medical, scientific, technological, and other research it has frozen that aims to save American lives, foster American success, preserve American security, and maintain America’s position as a global leader in innovation,” the lawsuit continues.
Learn more about the all-new VT News and subscribe today!
The university names Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., Education Secretary Linda McMahon, Attorney General Pam Bondi, acting administrator of the General Services Administration Stephen Ehikian, and several others in the suit.
The administration justified its actions by citing concerns over antisemitism and recent campus protests.
“Instead of grandstanding, Harvard should focus on rebuilding confidence among all students, particularly Jewish students,” a White House spokesman told The Wall Street Journal. “The White House remains open to dialogue, but serious changes are needed at Harvard.”
However, Harvard leadership argues that the funding freeze violates its First Amendment rights and is arbitrary, lacking any rational connection between antisemitism concerns and the suspended research funding.
“The government has cited the University’s response to antisemitism as a justification for its unlawful action,” Garber acknowledged. “As a Jew and as an American, I know very well that there are valid concerns about rising antisemitism.”
“Harvard takes that work seriously,” he added. “It is our moral imperative. Before taking punitive action, the law requires that the federal government engage with us about the ways we are fighting and will continue to fight antisemitism.”
Legal experts suggest that Harvard’s case may be weak in court, as universities have no inherent right to federal funding, but emphasize the broader issue of academic freedom and government overreach.
The government has also threatened further financial penalties, and Treasury Department officials are reportedly open to revoking the university’s nonprofit status.
Connor Walcott is the lead writer for Valuetainment.com. Follow Connor on X and look for him on VT’s “The Unusual Suspects.”
Got a hot scoop or an idea for a story? Connect with the VT writers on Minnect!
Add comment